Psychological determinants of 3R behavior: A secondary data analysis from Bappenas within the Framework of SDGs 12 in Indonesia

Authors

  • Renanda Pratama Herdianto Master Program in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Semarang, Semarang, Central Java 50196, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/sudeij.v3i1.2026.3162

Keywords:

3R behavior, environmental psychology, Indonesia, SDG 12, secondary data analysis

Abstract

Background: Urban areas in Indonesia face mounting waste challenges driven by rapid population growth and unsustainable consumption. To advance Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 12 on responsible consumption and production, this study investigates the psychological determinants of 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) behavior using secondary data from the Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas). Methods: Employing a descriptive–correlational design, the research operationalizes environmental awareness, pro-environmental attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and social norms through macro-level proxy indicators. The study utilizes a purposive sampling of urban datasets (2021–2022), where psychological constructs are proxied by infrastructure density, participation rates, and local policy metrics, subsequently analyzed through multiple regression using R and SPSS software to ensure statistical rigor. Findings: Regression analysis reveals that pro-environmental attitudes and perceived behavioral control are the strongest predictors of 3R engagement, while social norms play a reinforcing role. These findings align with the Theory of Planned Behavior and Value Belief Norm Theory. Collectively, these psychological factors explain approximately 64% of the variance in 3R behavior, confirming that both individual motivations and collective social pressures are critical drivers of environmentally responsible action in the Indonesian context. Conclusion: These results underscore the importance of embedding behavioral perspectives into sustainability strategies. By demonstrating how psychological factors shape waste-related actions, the study highlights the need for policies that go beyond infrastructure focusing instead on motivation, capability, and social reinforcement to foster lasting 3R engagement. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study offers one of the first empirical analyses using national level data to explain psychological drivers of sustainable waste behavior in Indonesia, providing a foundation for targeted strategies that integrate behavioral insights into SDGs 12 implementation.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Alt, M., Bruns, H., DellaValle, N., & Murauskaite-Bull, I. (2024). Synergies of interventions to promote pro-environmental behaviors – A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Global Environmental Change, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102776

Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2006.12.002

Bappenas. (2021). Food Loss and Waste in Indonesia: Study Report. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas.

Bappenas. (2022). Kajian Keberlanjutan Fasilitas Pemilahan dan Pengolahan Sampah di Indonesia. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas.

Berita Satu. (n.d.). Kementerian PU Dorong 100 Persen Rumah Tangga Kelola Sampah Nasional. BeritaSatu.com. https://www.beritasatu.com/ekonomi/2930980/kementerian-pu-dorong-100-persen-rumah-tangga-kelola-sampah-nasional

Brick, C., & Lai, C. K. (2022). Promoting pro-environmental behavior from attitudes to action: Mechanisms and interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101747

Davis, J. L., & Stroink, M. L. (2021). The relationship between values, beliefs, and pro-environmental behaviors in a collectivist culture. Environment and Behavior, 53(8), 888–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165211009725

de Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005

Díaz, M. F., Charry, A., Sellitti, S., Ruzzante, M., Enciso, K., & Burkart, S. (2020). Psychological Factors Influencing Pro-environmental Behavior in Developing Countries: Evidence From Colombian and Nicaraguan Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 580730. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.580730/BIBTEX

Gärling, T., Fujii, S., Gärling, A., & Jakobsson, C. (2003). Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of proenvironmental behavior intention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00081-6

Ghaffar, A., & Islam, T. (2024). Factors leading to sustainable consumption behavior: an empirical investigation among millennial consumers. Kybernetes, 53(8), 2574–2592. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2022-1675

Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 541–579. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115048

Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/IJOP.12034

Hadi, S., & Siregar, H. (2023). Household waste sorting behavior and policy implications in Indonesia. Waste Management & Research, 41(12), 1802–1815. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X231200456

Han, H. (2015). Travelers’ pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tourism Management, 47, 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.014

Hastuti, K. P., Arisanty, D., Muhaimin, M., Angriani, P., Alviawati, E., Aristin, N. F., & Rahman, A. M. (2024). Factors affecting pro-environmental behaviour of Indonesian university students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(1), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.006

Iqbal, A., Saraswati, E., T, S., & Tojibussabirin, M. (2024). Green consumption behaviour in Indonesia: exploring the role of government support. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2439546. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2439546

Kaiser, F. G. (2006). A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: Norms and anticipated feelings of regret in conservationism. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.028

Kaiser, F. G., & Scheuthle, H. (2003). Two challenges to a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: Moral norms and just world beliefs in conservationism. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(5), 1033–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00316-1

Klöckner, C. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour-A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1028–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014

Kurniawan, R., & Sembiring, E. (2024). Improving household waste management in Indonesia: Intervention impact on sorting behavior. Waste Management & Research, 42(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X231197473

Nuryadin, A., Subagiyo, L., Sulaeman, N. F., Dinurrohmah, S., & Rahmawati, P. S. (2023). Investigation of students’ pro-environmental behavior around Indonesia’s new capital city. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE, 12(2), 594–600. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.24423

Pambudi, N. F. (2025). Enhancing public participation in plastic waste: Community perspective on sustainability dimensions. Journal of Materials Cycles and Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-025-02294-5

Rochman, M. F., & Rahmawati, S. (2023). Social norms and community participation in sustainable waste management programs in Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(12), 9874. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129874

Schultz, P. W., & Kaiser, F. G. (2022). The future of environmental psychology: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101856

Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2021). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behavior: The role of values, situational factors, and goals. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46, 277–306. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-083643

Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175

Suminar, J. R., & Arifah, N. (2024). The role of family norms and exposure to social media in pro-environmental behavior among Indonesian youth. Frontiers in Communication, 9, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1360219

Voronkova, A. (2025). Predictors of waste management behaviours in coastal Java and Bali, Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102237

Zhao, R., & Geng, Y. (2023). Linking behavioral intentions with sustainable waste practices in developing economies: A multi-city comparative study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106791

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Herdianto, R. P. (2026). Psychological determinants of 3R behavior: A secondary data analysis from Bappenas within the Framework of SDGs 12 in Indonesia. Sustainable Urban Development and Environmental Impact Journal, 3(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.61511/sudeij.v3i1.2026.3162

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check