The impact of driving experience on consumer adoption intentions of electric motorcycles: An analysis of perceived advantage, ease of use, and risk factors

Authors

  • Taufiq Ainun Najib Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java 16424, Indonesia
  • Ratih Dyah Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java 16424, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/stum.v1i2.2024.1273

Keywords:

electric motorcycle, consumer adoptions, driving experience

Abstract

Background: his study investigates consumer attitudes and perceptions toward adopting electric motorcycles, focusing on the perceived relative advantage, ease of use, and risk associated with usage. The aim is to examine how driving experience influences these perceptions and ultimately impacts the intention to adopt electric motorcycles. Previous studies have highlighted the relevance of consumer perceptions in adoption decisions, yet few have examined the influence of direct driving experience on perceived advantages, ease of use, and risks associated with electric motorcycles. Methods: A quantitative approach was applied, involving survey-based data collection from a sample of respondents with varying levels of driving experience with electric motorcycles. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. Findings: Findings indicate that driving experience significantly enhances the perceived relative advantage and ease of use, while reducing perceived risk. These factors, in turn, positively influence adoption intentions, demonstrating that driving experience indirectly impacts adoption by shaping perceptions of advantage, ease, and risk. However, direct effects of driving experience on adoption intention were not observed. Expanding on prior research, this study provides insights into how experience shapes consumer perspectives on electric motorcycles, thus contributing to understanding adoption behavior in this sector. Conclusion: driving trials appear essential in promoting adoption, as they cultivate positive perceptions that drive consumer intent. Novelty/Originality of this article: The novelty of this study lies in highlighting the role of experiential factors as indirect mediators of adoption intentions, providing a unique perspective in the context of electric motorcycle adoption.

References

Adhikari, M., Ghimire, L. P., Kim, Y., Aryal, P., & Khadka, S. B. (2020). Identification and analysis of barriers against electric vehicle use. Sustainability, 12(12), 4850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124850

Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., & Rahman, I. (2017). Adoption of PHEV/EV in Malaysia: A critical review on predicting consumer behaviour. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 849–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.121

Axsen, J., Cairns, J., Dusyk, N., & Goldberg, S. (2018). What drives the pioneers? applying lifestyle theory to early electric vehicle buyers in Canada. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.015

Barkenbus, J. N. (2020). Prospects for Electric Vehicles. Sustainability, 12(14), 5813. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145813

Bjerkan, K. Y., Nørbech, T. E., & Nordtømme, M. E. (2016). Incentives for promoting battery electric vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 43, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.002

Carley, S., Krause, R. M., Lane, B. W., & Graham, J. D. (2013). Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: A survey of early impressions in large US cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 18, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2012.09.007

Chen, C., Xu, X., & Frey, S. (2016). Who wants solar water heaters and alternative fuel vehicles? assessing social–psychological predictors of intensi adopsi and policy support in China. Energy Research & Social Science, 15, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.02.006

Chhikara, R., Garg, R., Chhabra, S., Karnatak, U., & Agrawal, G. (2021). Factors affecting adoption of electric vehicles in India: An exploratory study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 100, 103084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103084

Chu, W., Im, M., Song, M. R., & Park, J. (2019). Psychological and behavioral factors affecting electric vehicle adoption and satisfaction: A Comparative Study of early adopters in China and Korea. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 76, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.009

Coffman, M., Bernstein, P., & Wee, S. (2016). Electric vehicls revisited: A review of factors that affect adoption. Transport Reviews, 37(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1217282

Damayanti, S., Hidayatno, A., & Setiawan, A. D. (2020). User acceptance of electric vehicles in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3400934.3400956

Deloitte & Foundry. (2023). An electric revolution: the rise of Indonesi’s e- motorcycle. Indonesia.

Deuten, S., Gómez Vilchez, J. J., & Thiel, C. (2020). Analysis and testing of electric car incentive scenarios in the Netherlands and Norway. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119847

Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy, 48, 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009

Egnér, F., & Trosvik, L. (2018). Electric vehicle adoption in Sweden and the impact of local policy instruments. Energy Policy, 121, 584–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.040

Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e621072012-217

Hair, J.F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2010). A primer on partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.

Hair, Jr.F., Matthews, L., Matthes, R.L & Starstedt, M. (2017) PLS-SEM or CB- SEM: update guidelines on which method to suse. Interntional Journal of Multivariate data analysis, l(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624

Han, L., Wang, S., Zhao, D., & Li, J. (2017). The intention to adopt electric vehicles: Driven by functional and non-functional values. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 103, 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.033

Haustein, S., Jensen, A. F., & Cherchi, E. (2021). Battery electric vehicle adoption in Denmark and Sweden: Recent changes, related factors and policy implications. Energy Policy, 149, 112096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112096

Helveston, J. P., Liu, Y., Feit, E. M., Fuchs, E., Klampfl, E., & Michalek, J. J. (2015). Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? measuring consumer preferences in the U.S. and China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 73, 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.01.002

Helveston, J. P., Liu, Y., Feit, E. M., Fuchs, E., Klampfl, E., & Michalek, J. J. (2015). Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? measuring consumer preferences in the U.S. and China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 73, 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.01.002

Jansson, J., Nordlund, A., & Westin, K. (2017). Examining drivers of sustainable consumption: The influence of norms and opinion leadership on electric vehicle adoption in Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 154, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.186

Jensen, A. F., Cherchi, E., & Mabit, S. L. (2013). On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle. TransportationResearch Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.006

Lai, I., Liu, Y., Sun, X., Zhang, H., & Xu, W. (2015). Factors influencing the behavioural intention towards Full Electric Vehicles: An empirical study in Macau. Sustainability 7(9), 12564 –12585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70912564

Lin, B., & Wu, W. (2018). Why people want to buy electric vehicle: An empirical study in first-tier cities of China. Energy Policy, 112, 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.026

Liu, X., Sun, X., Zheng, H., & Huang, D. (2021). Do policy incentives drive electric vehicle adoption? Evidence from China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 150, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.05.013

Liu, Y., et al. (2021). Factors influencing electric vehicle adoption: A meta-analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 101, 103090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103090

Liu, Y., Ouyang, Z., & Cheng, P. (2019). Predicting consumers’ adoption of electric vehicles during the City Smog Crisis: An application of the Protective Action Decision Model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 64, 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.013

Malhotra, N. K. (2020). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation (Seventh Edition). Pearson Education Inc.

Murugan, S., & Marisamynathan, S. (2022). Analysis of barriers to adopt electric vehicles in India using fuzzy DEMATEL and relative importance index approaches. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(2), 795–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.02.007

Nian, V., Hari, M. P., & Yuan, J. (2019). A new business model for encouraging the adoption of electric vehicles in the absence of policy support. Applied Energy, 235, 1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.126

Ouyang, D., Zhou, S., & Ou, X. (2021). The total cost of electric vehicle ownership: A consumer-oriented study of China’s post-subsidy era. Energy Policy, 149, 112023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112023

Ozaki, R., & Sevastyanova, K. (2011). Going hybrid: An analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Energy Policy, 39(5), 2217–2227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.024

Peters, A., & Dütschke, E. (2014). How do consumers perceive electric vehicles? A comparison of German consumer groups. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2013.879037

Rauh, N., Günther, M., Franke, T., & Krems, J. F. (2017). Increasing the efficient usage of electric vehicle range-effects of driving experience and coping information. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 3619–3633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.326

Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bodin, J. (2015). Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 34, 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.010

Sang, Y.-N., & Bekhet, H. A. (2015). Modelling Electric Vehicle Usage Intentions: An empirical study in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.045

Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004

She, Z.-Y., Qing Sun, Ma, J.-J., & Xie, B.-C. (2017). What are the barriers to widespread adoption of battery electric vehicles? A survey of public perception in Tianjin, China. Transport Policy, 56, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.001

Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2014). The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 68, 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.043

Singh, V., Singh, V., & Vaibhav, S. (2021). Analysis of electric vehicle trends, development and policies in India. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(3), 1180–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.06.006

Song, R., & Potoglou, D. (2020). Are existing battery electric vehicles adoption studies able to inform policy? A review for Policymakers. Sustainability, 12(16), 6494. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166494

Weinert, J., Ma, C., & Cherry, C. (2007). The transition to electric bikes in China: History and key reasons for rapid growth. Transportation, 34(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9118-8

White, L. V., & Sintov, N. D. (2017). You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle intensi adopsis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 99, 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.008

Xu, B., et al. (2020). Understanding consumer attitudes toward electric vehicles in China: A meta-analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 82, 102315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102315

Xu, G., Wang, S., Li, J., & Zhao, D. (2020). Moving towards sustainable purchase behavior: Examining the determinants of consumers’ intentions to adopt electric vehicles. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(18), 22535–22546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08835-9

Yang, H. (2019). Assessing the effects of psychological factors on consumers' electric vehicle adoption: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 11(14), 3894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143894

Zhang, Y., Qian, Z. (Sean), Sprei, F., & Li, B. (2016). The impact of car specifications, prices and incentives for battery electric vehicles in Norway: Choices of heterogeneous consumers. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 69, 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.06.014

Downloads

Published

2024-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check