Institutional governance and regulatory quality in building trust in pawnshop services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/napbres.v3i2.2026.3469Keywords:
institutional governance, pawnshop services, public trust, regulatory qualityAbstract
Background: The rapid expansion of pawnshop services within emerging financial systems has increased their socio-economic importance and institutional relevance. However, existing financial trust literature remains predominantly bank-centric and continues to conceptualize trust primarily through customer satisfaction, service quality, and interpersonal interaction. Such approaches remain insufficient for explaining trust formation in collateral-based financial services characterized by custodial dependency, asymmetric vulnerability, and institutional exposure. This study aims to conceptualize institutional trust in pawnshop services as an outcome of governance–regulation alignment within alternative financial systems. Methods: This study adopts a conceptual theory-building design using an abductive reasoning approach. Drawing upon institutional theory, governance theory, and regulatory credibility theory, the study develops an integrative conceptual framework through iterative theoretical synthesis and analytical refinement. Findings: The study argues that institutional trust in pawnshop services does not emerge solely from individual perceptions of service quality, but from the institutional coherence between governance quality and regulatory credibility. The study introduces custodial vulnerability as a distinct conceptual construct describing the ethical, relational, and institutional exposure experienced by consumers in collateral-based financial transactions. The findings further indicate that transparent governance practices, procedural fairness, accountability mechanisms, and credible regulatory oversight collectively strengthen institutional legitimacy and public trust. Conclusion: This study reconceptualizes trust in pawnshop services as an emergent institutional outcome rather than merely an interpersonal or psychological perception. The proposed framework highlights the importance of governance–regulation alignment as a structural foundation of sustainable institutional trust within alternative financial services. Novelty/Originality of this Study: This study offers two primary conceptual contributions by introducing custodial vulnerability as a novel construct within collateral-based finance and by positioning governance–regulation alignment as the structural basis of institutional trust formation in pawnshop services.
References
Aguilera, R. V., Judge, W. Q., & Terjesen, S. A. (2018). Corporate Governance Deviance. The Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 87–109. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26395025
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0188
Aparicio-Pérez, D., Balaguer-Coll, M. T., Tortosa-Ausina, E., & Jiménez-Fernández, E. (2025). Transparency in Local Government: Theory and Evidence. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5367534
Beck, T., & Cull, R. (2020). Small- and medium-sized enterprise finance in Africa. Journal of Banking & Finance, 114, 105–121.
Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2015). The “Macro” And The “Micro” Of Legitimacy: Toward A Multilevel Theory Of The Legitimacy Process. The Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49–75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43700542
Blind, P. (2007). Building Trust in Government in the Twenty-First Century: Review of Literature and Emerging Issues. Undesa.
Broekhoff, M. C., van der Cruijsen, C., & de Haan, J. (2024). Towards financial inclusion: Trust in banks’ payment services among groups at risk. Economic Analysis and Policy, 82, 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EAP.2024.02.038
Charron, N., & Rothstein, B. (2018). Regions of trust and distrust: How good institutions can foster social cohesion. In U. Bernitz, M. Mårtensson, L. Oxelheim, & T. Persson (Eds.). Bridging the Prosperity Gap in the EU: The Social Challenge Ahead. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786436672.00017
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2020). Balancing Governance Capacity and Legitimacy: How the Norwegian Government Handled the COVID-19 Crisis as a High Performer. Public Administration Review, 80(5), 774–779. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13241
Clarke, T. (2022). Comparative Corporate Governance. In Corporate Governance: An International Review. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429294648
Cornelissen, J. (2017). Developing propositions, a process model of theory building, and a typology of conceptual contributions. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0131
Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Ríos, A.-M., & Guillamón, M.-D. (2023). Transparency in public administrations: a structured literature review. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 35(5), 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-10-2022-0158
Martinez-Peria, M. S., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Tressel, T. (2015). The Impact of the Global Financial Crisis on Firms Capital Structure. In World Bank Research Observer. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7522
Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8
Filatotchev, I., Jackson, G., & Nakajima, C. (2013). Corporate governance and national institutions: A review and emerging research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4), 965–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9293-9
Gilson, L. L., & Goldberg, C. B. (2015). Editors’ Comment: So, What Is a Conceptual Paper? Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115576425
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2020). Worldwide Governance Indicators 2019. World Bank.
Verhoest, K., Latusek, D., Six, F., Maman, L., Papadopoulos, Y., Schomaker, R. M., & Trondal, J. (2024). Trust and distrust in public governance settings: Conceptualising and testing the link in regulatory relations. Journal of Trust Research, 14(2), 127–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2024.2383918
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302
Nicholls, A., & Huybrechts, B. (2016). Sustaining Inter-organizational Relationships Across Institutional Logics and Power Asymmetries: The Case of Fair Trade. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(4), 699–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2495-y
OECD. (2021). Trust in government. OECD Publishing.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan-OJK. (2025). Roadmap pengembangan dan penguatan pergadaian 2025–2030. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/Publikasi/Roadmap-dan-Pedoman/PVML/Documents/Roadmap%20Pengembangan%20dan%20Penguatan%20Pergadaian%202025-2030.pdf
Palmisano, F., & Sacchi, A. (2024). Trust in public institutions, inequality, and digital interaction: Empirical evidence from European Union countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 79, 103582. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMACRO.2023.103582
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2020). Governance, Politics and the State. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=15FKEAAAQBAJ
Rothstein, B., & Eek, D. (2009). Political corruption and social trust: An experimental approach. Rationality and Society, 21(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463108099349
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=7Y-0bDCw_aEC
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2019.07.039
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution?. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Syahrudin, Wiwit Pawitri, Rheishi Alma Nazarani Sanusi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
