Stakeholder mapping for integrated mangrove ecotourism governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/mangrove.v1i2.2024.3140Keywords:
conservation, key players, stakeholder mapping, sustainable tourismAbstract
Background: Gunung Anyar mangrove ecotourism represents one of the practical implementations of sustainable tourism that integrates natural resource utilization, conservation efforts and ecological sustainability. The site covers approximately 25 hectares, where mangrove vegetation serves as the main attraction, complemented by various facilities and amenities. The ecotourism management operates collaboratively by involving diverse stakeholder groups to ensure the preservation of natural resources and ecosystem functions. However, these stakeholders are not yet effectively managed, and there is a lack of clear rules governing their interactions and roles. This study aims to map and analyze the stakeholders involved. Methods: The research was conducted in Gunung Anyar District, Surabaya, with respondents selected using purposive sampling. Data were obtained through questionnaires, interviews and direct observation. The research methods included stakeholder identification, classification and investigation of their relationships. The analysis tool used was the stakeholder grid. Findings: The results show that the stakeholders identified as key players (Quadrant I) are the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, the Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy, the Department of Food Security and Agriculture, UPT Kebun Raya Mangrove, and the Tourism Awareness Group. Conclusion: Twenty stakeholders were classified into four groups, namely the public sector, private sector, non-governmental organizations, and local community groups involved in the development of Gunung Anyar mangrove ecotourism, Surabaya. Their positions were classified as Subject, Key Players, Context Setter, and Crowd based on their level of influence and importance. Novelty/Originality of this Article: This study offers the first quantitative stakeholder mapping of the Gunung Anyar mangrove ecotourism area, revealing five critical Key Players and structural governance gaps that previous studies have not identified. The findings can support stakeholder participation in determining policy schemes and contribute to wiser management and utilization of mangrove forest ecotourism in the future.
References
Adger, W. N., & Luttrell, C. (2000). Property rights and the utilisation of wetlands. In Ecological Economics (Vol. 35). www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon
Agaton, C. B., & Collera, A. A. (2022). Now or later? Optimal timing of mangrove rehabilitation under climate change uncertainty. Forest Ecology and Management, 503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119739
Alfiandri, A., & Mayarni, M. (2023). Implementation Model of Governance Policy for Developing Coastal Border Ecotourism in Indonesia. BIO Web of Conferences, 70. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20237004005
Ayres. (2001). Strong versus weak sustainability: economics, natural sciences and “Concilience.” Environ Ethics, 2, 155–168. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics200123225
Bungin. (2003). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Pemahaman Filosofis dan Metodologis ke Arah Penguasaan Model Aplikasi. Puja Grafindo Persada.
Dandy, N., Fiorini, S., & Davies, A. L. (2014). Agenda-setting and power in collaborative natural resource management. Environmental Conservation, 41(4), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892913000441
Department of Food Security and Agriculture Surabaya. (2011). Kebun Raya Mangrove. Surabaya.
Dougill, A. J., Fraser, E. D. G., Holden, J., Hubacek, K., Prell, C., Reed, M. S., Stagl, S., & Stringer, L. C. (2006). Learning from Doing Participatory Rural Research : Lessons from the Peak District National Park. 57(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00051.x
Ellis, M., Holloway, S. R., Wright, R., & Fowler, C. S. (2016). Agents of change: Mixed-race households and the dynamics of neighborhood segregation in the United States. In Handbook of Applied System Science (pp. 486–511). Taylor and Francis Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315748771
Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fennel. (2020). Ecotourism. Routledge, New York, London.
Filho, W. L., Azeiteiro, U., Alves, F., Pace, P., Mifsud, M., Brandli, L., Caeiro, S. S., Disterheft, A., Leal, W., Azeiteiro, U., Alves, F., Pace, P., & Mifsud, M. (2018). Reinvigorating the sustainable development research agenda : the role of the sustainable development goals ( SDG ). International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2017.1342103
Grimm, I. J., & Sampaio, C. A. C. (2017). Crise ambiental, política climática e o turismo: algumas reflexões. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais (Online), 44, 95–112. https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2176-947820170164
Harahab, N., Riniwati, H., Utami, T. N., Abidin, Z., & Wati, L. A. (2021). Sustainability analysis of marine ecotourism management for preserving natural resources and coastal ecosystem functions. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 77(2), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.77.2.28670
Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2006). More than an “industry”: The forgotten power of tourism as a social force. Tourism Management, 27(6), 1192–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.05.020
Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2020). Socialising tourism for social and ecological justice after COVID-19. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1757748
Idrus, M. (2009). Metode Penelitian IlmuIlmu Sosial (Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif). UII Press.
Iied, K. S., Challenges, K. E. Y., Iied, C. T., Winckler, G., Gtz, W. H., Iied, M. P., Wynberg, R., Africa, S., Rodriguez, S., Rica, C., & Huq, S. (2002). OPINION Implementing the Rio Conventions : Implications for the South. Johannesburg.
IPCC. (2021). Synthesis Report of the Sixth Assessment Report. A Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Kalbach, J. (2020). Mapping Experiences. Newton, MA: O’Reilly Media.
Koschmann, M. A. (2017). Stakeholder Communication. March. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc193
Manowong, E., & Ogunlana, S. (2010). Strategies and Tactics for Managing Construction Stakeholders. 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315349.ch8
Materials, B., Delhi, N., Khas, H., Khas, H., & Delhi, N. (1992). Hierarchy and Classification of Program Plan Elements Using Interpretive Structural Modeling : A Case Study of Energy Conservation in the Indian Cement Industry. 5(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01083616
Maulana, M. F. (2022). ECONOMIC VALUATION OF “ BEEJAY BAKAU RESORT ( BJBR )” MANGROVE FOREST TOURISM PROBOLINGGO AND IT IS IMPACT TO THE ENVIRONMENT TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT. 22(4), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.agrise.2022.022.4.14
MF Maulana, S. F. R. H. (2023). ALTERNATIVE BEST POLICY SCENARIO OF BEEJAY BAKAU RESORT, PROBOLINGGO BASED ON SUSTAINABLE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT: AN APPLICATION OF THE PROMOTHEE. ISSN 2988-618X, 1, 55–80.
Mushove, P., & Ã, C. V. (2005). Heads or tails ? Stakeholder analysis as a tool for conservation area management. 15, 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.008
Nugroho, I. A., Darwo, & Yuniarti, D. (2021). Stakeholders’ mapping and strategy for restoring peatland forest in west tanjung jabung jambi, indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research, 8(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.20886/IJFR.2021.8.1.37-57
Nugroho, I. A., & Yuniarti, D. (2021). STAKEHOLDERS ’ MAPPING AND STRATEGY FOR RESTORING PEATLAND FOREST IN WEST TANJUNG JABUNG JAMBI ,. 8(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.20886/ijfr.2021.8.1.37-57
Purvis, B. (2018). Three pillars of sustainability : in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
Rachmawati, D. E., & Anjana, M. R. G. (2021). Stakeholders in the Adventure Tourism Development At Curug Bibijilan Sukabumi Regency. Media Konservasi, 26(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.29244/medkon.26.2.99-110
Rachmawati, E., Redito, M., & Anjana, G. (2021). STAKEHOLDERS IN THE ADVENTURE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT AT CURUG BIBIJILAN SUKABUMI REGENCY. Media Konservasi, 26(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.29244/medkon.26.1.99-110
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009a). Who ’ s in and why ? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009b). Who ’ s in and why ? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009c). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009d). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
Salman, A. (2022). Perspectives of Key Stakeholders on Ecotourism Sustainability and Stakeholder Management: A Case Study of Penang Hill. Review of Tourism Research, 19(2), 159–193. https://ertr-ojs-tamu.tdl.org/ertr/article/view/814
Sutopo. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta.
Tandio, T., Kusmana, C., Fauzi, A., & Hilmi, E. (2023). Identification of Key Actors in Mangroves Plantation using the MACTOR Tool: Study in DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 11(January), 163–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v11i1.593
Tiarantika, R., & Efani, A. (2024). Developing a Decision Support System for Sustainable Management of Community-Based Ecotourism: A Case Study of CMC Tiga Warna. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 19(6), 2205. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190620
TIES-The International Ecotourism Society. (2019). What is Ecotourism? https://doi.org/https://ecotourism.org/what-is-ecotourism/
Tourism Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Tourism and climate change stocktake 2023. Becken, & D. Scott (Eds.).
Trisnanto, A., Soekmadi, R., Arifin, H. S., & Noorachmat, B. P. (2023). Assessing the importance of stakeholder analysis in utilizing homegarden (pekarangan) agrotourism in East Java, Indonesia. Journal of Natural Resources & Environment Management/Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan, 13(4), 549. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.13.4.549-560
Youn, H., & Baek, J. S. (2024). Assemblage-based stakeholder analysis in design: a conceptual framework through the lenses of post–anthropocentrism. CoDesign. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2024.2358966
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Fajar Maulana, Candra Adi Intyas, Achmad Riyadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
