Evaluation of heritage character in the European zone of Kota Lama Surabaya post-revitalization through an urban design elements approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jpstd.v4i1.2026.4012Keywords:
European zone, heritage character, revitalization, urban design elementsAbstract
Background: The revitalization of the European Zone represents an effort by the Surabaya city government to improve the quality of the area without erasing its historical value and identity. Previous studies have generally assessed the success of revitalization based on either the physical condition of buildings or the activities within the area, treated separately, while the relationship between urban design elements and heritage character remains rarely discussed. This study aims to analyze the heritage character of the European Zone in Kota Lama Surabaya post-revitalization through eight urban design elements: land use, building form and massing, circulation and parking, open space, pedestrian ways, activity support, signage, and preservation. Methods: This study employs a descriptive qualitative method using field observation, documentation, and literature review. Findings: The results are then synthesized with four heritage character variables: physical urban form, spatial legibility, visual character, and heritage value. The findings indicate that the heritage character of the European Zone is formed through the interrelation of mutually reinforcing urban design elements that collectively shape the area's overall heritage character. Although the revitalization has successfully improved the physical quality of the area, the scope of intervention remains limited to a few main corridors, resulting in an uneven formation of the area's character. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that heritage character is determined not only by the presence of historic buildings but also by the relationships among elements that shape spatial structure, visual identity, area legibility, and historical value. These findings are expected to serve as a reference for the evaluation and future planning of heritage area revitalization. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study introduces an integrated framework linking urban design elements and heritage character to evaluate heritage-sensitive revitalization and cultural placemaking in public spaces.
References
Abdurahiman, S., Kasthurba, A. K., & Nuzhat, A. (2024). Assessing the socio-cultural impact of urban revitalisation using Relative Positive Impact Index (RPII). Built Heritage, 8, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00118-3
Agradiana, P., Effendi, A. C., Kurniati, D., & Murtiningrum, A. (2026). Study of urban design elements in Meruya Corridor, West Jakarta. TRAVE, 30(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.37277/trave.v30i1.2614
Aji, R. N. B., Hermawan, E. S., Riyadi, Trilaksana, A., Patridina, E., Nasution, Muharam, M. M., & Wisnu. (2023). History of edu-tourism for strengthening nationalism and heroism in the city of Surabaya. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 50, 543–547. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v50i1.9939
Bo, L., & Abdul Rani, M. F. (2025). The value of current sense of place in architectural heritage studies: A systematic review. Buildings, 15(6), 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060903
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Danisworo, M., & Martokusumo, W. (2002). Revitalisasi kawasan kota: Sebuah catatan dalam pengembangan dan pemanfaatan kawasan kota. Info URDI, 13.
Dinas Perumahan Rakyat dan Kawasan Permukiman serta Pertanahan Kota Surabaya. (2021). Peta peruntukan. https://petaperuntukan.dprkpp.web.id/
Dini, S. F., & Kurniawan, K. R. (2024). Contradictions of physical development in Lasem vernacular settlements against the principle of heritage area preservation. Proceedings of International Seminar on Vernacular Settlement, 12, 339–368. https://arch.su.ac.th/index.php/publication/w-publication?view=article&id=313
Duan, J., Lan, W., & Jiang, Y. (2022). An evaluation approach to spatial identity in historic urban areas from a humanistic perspective. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(5), 806–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.12.009
El-Deen, A. S. S., Aboulsaadat, A. H., & Nour, W. A. (2024). Reviving the past: Urban strategies for renovating historic commercial streets in city centers. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-024-00488-6
Fajriyah, A. N., & Sari, S. R. (2026). Genius loci European area of Old City of Surabaya: Challenges and opportunities for development (Literature study). Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 6(2), 1779–1786. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v6i2.52759
Febe, E., Sunaryo, R. G., & Damayanti, R. (2024). Spatial morphological analysis: Development of the North Krembangan area, Surabaya, Indonesia. International Journal on Livable Space, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25105/livas.v9i1.19685
Gorjian, M. (2025). Statistical methodologies for urban morphology indicators: A comprehensive review of quantitative approaches to sustainable urban form. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/8qn6g_v1
Hamida, I., & Sutiana. (2024). The impact of pedestrian ways revitalization on user intensities at Margonda Raya Street, Depok City. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1394(1), 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1394/1/012026
Hasyim, A., Istijanto, S., & Tohar, I. (2024). Kajian teori citra kota pada Jembatan Merah Plaza (JMP) Kota Surabaya. Arsitekno, 11(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.29103/arj.v11i1.15595
Huang, K., Kang, P., & Zhao, Y. (2024). Quantitative research of street interface morphology in urban historic districts: A case study of West Street Historic District, Quanzhou. npj Heritage Science, 12, 226. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01351-w
Institute for Transportation & Development Policy Indonesia. (2024). Rekomendasi peningkatan konektivitas dan aksesibilitas kawasan Kota Lama Surabaya. Institute for Transportation & Development Policy Indonesia. https://itdp-indonesia.org/publication/rekomendasi-peningkatan-konektivitas-dan-aksesibilitas-kawasan-kota-lama-surabaya/
Lestari, D., & Tamrin, M. H. (2025). Good tourism governance in the development of heritage tourism (Case study: Europeesche Champ in the Old Town of Surabaya). JKMP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik), 13(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.21070/jkmp.v13i2.1939
Lovra, É., & Sarihan, E. (2024). The formation and preservation of urban heritage through urban landscape transformation: A case study of Pittsburgh. Land, 13(11), 1816. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111816
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.
Ma, X., & Sun, J. (2024). A study of historic urban landscape change management based on layered interpretation: A case study of Dongxi Ancient Town. Land, 13(12), 2116. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122116
Mahindra, D. A., & Megawati, S. (2022). Implementasi kebijakan revitalisasi kawasan cagar budaya (Studi pada Jalan Panggung Kota Lama, Surabaya). Jurnal Publika, 10(1), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.26740/publika.v10n1.p219-230
Mansour, H. M., Alves, F. B., & da Costa, A. R. (2023). A comprehensive methodological approach for the assessment of urban identity. Sustainability, 15(18), 13350. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813350
Mau, D. P., Hendrawan, F., & Dinata, R. D. S. (2026). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings in cultural tourism: A multi-layered design-tourism interface framework from Kota Lama Surabaya. International Journal of Tourism Business Research (INTOUR), 5(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.29303/intour.v5i1.2994
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli.
Nurubiatmoko, A. V., Rukmi, W. I., & Sari, K. E. (2020). Pemilihan objek utama citra kawasan cagar budaya Jalan Rajawali. Jurnal Tata Kota dan Daerah (TAKODA), 12(1), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.takoda.2020.012.01.4
Pattacini, L. (2021). Defining public open spaces: An investigation framework to inform planning and design decision-making processes. Landscape Research, 46(5), 653–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2021.1881947
Phetsuriya, N., & Heath, T. (2021). Defining the distinctiveness of urban heritage identity: Chiang Mai Old City, Thailand. Social Sciences, 10(3), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10030101
Roberts, P., & Sykes, H. (2000). Urban regeneration: A handbook. SAGE Publications.
Romadhonita, N., & Elviana, E. (2023). Kajian karakteristik kawasan Tunjungan sebagai heritage Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Pengembangan Kota, 11(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.11.2.181-190
Shirvani, H. (1985). The urban design process. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Surjono, Jasmine, A. P., Kurniawan, E. B., Sari, K. E., & Erland, R. (2024). The influence of cultural heritage status on the quality of life of slum settlement community. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.70082/esiculture.vi.993
Verdini, G., & Xin, S. (2024). Heritage-led regeneration in Chinese intermediary cities: Understanding incremental changes under a ‘business as usual’ urban governance regime. Town Planning Review, 95(3). https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2023.41
Wijaya, V., Indrianto, A. T. L., & Oktavio, A. (2025). Revitalization of Surabaya’s old precinct: Challenge and strategy of growth. Ultima Management: Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 17(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.31937/manajemen.v17i1.4134
Yang, L., Zhu, Y., Chatzimichailidou, M., & Liu, X. (2023). Assessing human emotional responses to the design of public spaces around subway stations: A human factors research. Urban Design International, 28, 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-023-00219-y
Zhang, F., Sun, X., Liu, C., & Qiu, B. (2024). Effects of urban landmark landscapes on residents’ place identity: The moderating role of residence duration. Sustainability, 16(2), 761. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020761
Zhou, J., & Ujang, N. (2024). An analysis of pedestrian preferences for wayfinding signage in urban settings: Evidence from Nanning, China. Buildings, 14(9), 2986. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092986
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Flandi Tito Pratama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
