Mapping environmental contamination of carbon footprints and health impact from the breastmilk substitutes consumption in Southeast Asia: A scoping review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jevnah.v3i1.2026.3128Keywords:
brestmilk, breastfeeding carbon footprints, brestmilk subtitutes, environtment, pollutionAbstract
Background: In Southeast Asia, breastmilk substitutes (BMS) have quickly turned into a widely accepted social practice. But the health and environmental effects are not thoroughly examined. BMS producers and manufacturers, through their industrial processes, packaging waste, and transportation, are the major contributors to ecological degradation, while formula feeding brings health risks for infants. Methods: This scoping review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and brought together results from 23 articles published in reputable journals between 2015 and 2025. The databases explored were PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Crossref. Data was gathered, and the latter was done through the Joanna Briggs Institute tools, and then it was analyzed thematically. Findings: There is a clear link between BMS production and consumption, and major environmental impacts resulting from these 3-MCPD, glycidyl esters are examples of chemical contaminants; microplastics and large amounts of GHG emissions are also included (3–6 kg CO₂-eq per kg product). Water and energy use are augmented due to formula preparation, and the disposal of materials has worsened plastic pollution in urban rivers. Health investigations pointed out that babies on a formula diet are more exposed to infections. Economists' forecasts have also pointed to avoidable health and environmental costs arising from reduced breastfeeding, and these are found to be considerable. Conclusion: The use of BMS has a detrimental effect on both mankind and nature, while breastfeeding is still the most eco-friendly and health-producing feeding technique. Novelty/Originality: Besides being the first study to establish BMS consumption with environmental contamination, carbon footprints, and health outcomes in Southeast Asia, this review also redefined infant feeding as an issue of planetary health.
References
Andresen, E. C., Hjelkrem, A. G. R., Bakken, A. K., & Andersen, L. F. (2022). Environmental impact of feeding with infant formula in comparison with breastfeeding. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(11), 6397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116397
ASEAN. (2023). ASEAN Joint Statement on Climate Change. ASEAN. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/ASEAN-JS-on-Climate-Change-to-the-UNFCCC-COP28.pdf
Baker, P., Santos, T., Neves, P. A., Machado, P., Smith, J., Piwoz, E., ... & McCoy, D. (2021). First‐food systems transformations and the ultra‐processing of infant and young child diets: The determinants, dynamics and consequences of the global rise in commercial milk formula consumption. Maternal & child nutrition, 17(2), e13097. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13097
Ball, T. M., & Bennett, D. M. (2001). The economic impact of breastfeeding. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 48(1), 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70298-4
Binns, C., & Low, W. Y. (2022). Infant Formula Supply Problems and Public Health. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 34(6-7), 613-615. https://doi.org/10.1177/10105395221120696
Cavalcanti, M. B., Silva, I. D. C. G. D., Lamarca, F., & de Castro, I. R. R. (2024). Research on commercial milk formulas for young children: A scoping review. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 20(4), e13675. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13675
Cerceo, E., Saxer, K., Grossman, L., Shapley-Quinn, K., & Feldman-Winter, L. (2024). The climate crisis and breastfeeding: Opportunities for resilience. Journal of Human Lactation, 40(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344231216726
Dadhich, J. P., Smith, J. P., Iellamo, A., & Suleiman, A. (2021). Climate change and infant nutrition: estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from milk formula sold in selected Asia Pacific countries. Journal of Human Lactation, 37(2), 314-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334421994769
Gibson, S., Sahanggamu, D., Fatmaningrum, D., Curtis, V., & White, S. (2017). ‘Unfit for human consumption’: a study of the contamination of formula milk fed to young children in East Java, Indonesia. Tropical medicine & international health, 22(10), 1275-1282. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12927
Heine, R. G., AlRefaee, F., Bachina, P., De Leon, J. C., Geng, L., Gong, S., ... & Rogacion, J. M. (2017). Lactose intolerance and gastrointestinal cow’s milk allergy in infants and children–common misconceptions revisited. World Allergy Organization Journal, 10(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40413-017-0173-0
Karlsson, J. O., & Röös, E. (2019). Resource-efficient use of land and animals—Environmental impacts of food systems based on organic cropping and avoided food-feed competition. Land use policy, 85, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.035
Karlsson, J. O., Garnett, T., Rollins, N. C., & Röös, E. (2019). The carbon footprint of breastmilk substitutes in comparison with breastfeeding. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 436-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.043
Lehmann, G. M., LaKind, J. S., Davis, M. H., Hines, E. P., Marchitti, S. A., Alcala, C., & Lorber, M. (2018). Environmental chemicals in breast milk and formula: exposure and risk assessment implications. Environmental Health Perspectives, 126(9), 096001. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1953
Long, A., Mintz-Woo, K., Daly, H., O'Connell, M., Smyth, B., & Murphy, J. D. (2021). Infant feeding and the energy transition: a comparison between decarbonising breastmilk substitutes with renewable gas and achieving the global nutrition target for breastfeeding. Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, 129280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129280
Mohapatra, I., & Samantaray, S. R. (2023). Breastfeeding and environmental consciousness: A narrative review of environmental implications and potential contributions to reduce waste and energy consumption. Cureus, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45878
Mowl, Z. K., LeFevre, A., & Ververs, M. (2023). A comparison of total cost estimates between exclusive breast-feeding and breast milk substitute usage in humanitarian contexts. Public health nutrition, 26(12), 3162-3172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980023002434
Nguyen, P., Binns, C. W., Ha, A. V. V., Chu, T. K., Nguyen, L. C., Duong, D. V., ... & Lee, A. H. (2020). Prelacteal and early formula feeding increase risk of infant hospitalisation: a prospective cohort study. Archives of disease in childhood, 105(2), 122-126. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-316937
Ogunba, B. (2019). Breastfeeding–the environmentally friendly and ideal method of infant feeding. Nigerian Journal of Environment and Health, 2(1), 30-36.
Perretta, L., Ouldibbat, L., Hagadorn, J. I., & Brumberg, H. L. (2021). High versus low medium chain triglyceride content of formula for promoting short‐term growth of preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002777.pub2
Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018). Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360(6392), 987-992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216
Pope, D. H., Karlsson, J. O., Baker, P., & McCoy, D. (2021). Examining the environmental impacts of the dairy and baby food industries: are first-food systems a crucial missing part of the healthy and sustainable food systems agenda now underway?. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(23), 12678. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312678
Pramono, A., Hikmawati, A., Hartiningtiyaswati, S., & Smith, J. (2025). Breastfeeding support and protection during natural disaster and climate-related emergencies in Indonesia: policy audit. Journal of Human Lactation, 41(2), 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344251322770
Pries, A. M., Huffman, S. L., Adhikary, I., Upreti, S. R., Dhungel, S., Champeny, M., & Zehner, E. (2016a). Promotion and prelacteal feeding of breastmilk substitutes among mothers in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 12, 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12205
Pries, A. M., Huffman, S. L., Mengkheang, K., Kroeun, H., Champeny, M., Roberts, M., & Zehner, E. (2016b). Pervasive promotion of breastmilk substitutes in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, and high usage by mothers for infant and young child feeding. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 12, 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12271
Quesada, J. A., Méndez, I., & Martín-Gil, R. (2020). The economic benefits of increasing breastfeeding rates in Spain. International breastfeeding journal, 15(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-020-00277-w
Rollins, N. C., Bhandari, N., Hajeebhoy, N., Horton, S., Lutter, C. K., Martines, J. C., ... & Victora, C. G. (2016). Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?. The lancet, 387(10017), 491-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2
Septiani, N. N., Pramono, A., Nguyen, T. T., Mathisen, R., & Smith, J. (2025). Economic and environmental impacts of commercial milk formula in Indonesia: estimates and comparisons using the Cost of Not Breastfeeding, Green Feeding, and Mothers’ Milk Tools. International Breastfeeding Journal, 20(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-025-00732-6
Smith, J. P., Borg, B., Nguyen, T. T., Iellamo, A., Pramono, A., & Mathisen, R. (2024). Estimating carbon and water footprints associated with commercial milk formula production and use: development and implications of the Green Feeding Climate Action Tool. Frontiers in Nutrition, 11, 1371036. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1371036
Sritangsirikul, S., Kitsahawong, K., Matangkasombut, O., Seminario, A. L., & Pitiphat, W. (2024). A longitudinal study on the impact of breastfeeding with or without formula milk on dental caries. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 10384. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60582-w
Tran, S. C., Nguyen, N. H., Vu, T. N., Bui, T. C., Phung, L. C., Tran, T. T., ... & Thai, T. N. H. (2023). Risk assessment of 3-MCPD esters and glycidyl esters from the formulas for infants and young children up to 36 months of age. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 40(6), 723-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2023.2209899
Watts, N., Beagley, J., Coleman, S., Kelman, I., McGushin, A., Romanello, M., ... & Triñanes, J. (2021). Erratum: Department of Error (The Lancet (2021) 397 (10269)(129–170),(S014067362032290X),(10.1016/S0140-6736 (20) 32290-X)). The Lancet, 397(10269), 98-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32290-x
Whitmee, S., Haines, A., Beyrer, C., Boltz, F., Capon, A. G., de Souza Dias, B. F., ... & Yach, D. (2015). Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health. The lancet, 386(10007), 1973-2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60901-1
WHO. (1981). International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241541601
WHO. (2018). Climate Change and Health. World Health Organization.
WHO. (2023). “Infant and Young Child Feeding.” World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding
Willcox, J. C., Februhartanty, J., Satheannoppakao, W., Hutchinson, C., Itsiopoulos, C., & Worsley, A. (2021). Commercial growing up milks: usage frequency and associated child and demographic factors across four Asia Pacific countries. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 34(3), 524-533. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12851
Zehner, E. (2016). Promotion and consumption of breastmilk substitutes and infant foods in Cambodia, Nepal, Senegal and Tanzania. Maternal & child nutrition, 12(Suppl 2), 3. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12308
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kusmayra Ambarwati, Andini Pramono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
