Exploring geopolitical understanding through an integrated role play, mindfulness, and geospatial learning sequence in senior high school geography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jegeo.v3i1.2026.3803Keywords:
geography education, geopolitics, geospatial learning, mindfulness, role play, spatial thinking, student engagementAbstract
Background: Geopolitics is a complex component of senior high school geography because students must connect strategic location, territorial relations, international cooperation, and spatial processes. This study examines an integrated learning sequence combining mindfulness, diplomatic Role Play, Blind Navigation, mission-envelope inquiry, geospatial exploration, and reflection. Methods: A descriptive qualitative design was employed in one Grade XII class of 36 students at a public senior high school in Sukabumi Regency, West Java, Indonesia, during the 2025/2026 academic year. The 135-minute session generated data through classroom observations, field notes, student reflections, discussions, presentations, worksheets, photographs, and learning documentation. Data were analyzed through data condensation, thematic coding, cross-source comparison, and conclusion verification. Findings: Three themes emerged: active participation and collaboration, contextual geopolitical and spatial reasoning, and learning readiness and reflection. Students engaged in communication, negotiation, spatial instruction, and case interpretation. They connected Indonesia’s geographical position with maritime connectivity, trade routes, regional cooperation, environmental concerns, and strategic considerations. Digital maps supported the examination of relevant locations and spatial relationships. Student reflections indicated that mindfulness provided a useful transition into learning activities. Conclusion: The integrated sequence provided a contextual and participatory approach to teaching geopolitical concepts. The findings represent observed classroom patterns and student experiences rather than evidence of causal effectiveness. Future research should examine learning outcomes using longer implementation periods, validated instruments, larger samples, and quantitative or mixed-method designs. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study integrates mindfulness, diplomatic role play, spatial communication, and geospatial inquiry within a single geography learning sequence to support students’ understanding of geopolitics.
References
Bednarz, S. W., & Lee, J. (2019). What improves spatial thinking? Evidence from the Spatial Thinking Abilities Test. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(4), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2018.1543827
Boix-Mansilla, V., & Jackson, A. (2011). Educating for global competence: Preparing our youth to engage the world. Asia Society.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ergen, B., & Kanadli, S. (2021). The effect of role-playing method on academic achievement and attitudes: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.332.8
Favier, T. T., & van der Schee, J. A. (2014). The effects of geography lessons with geospatial technologies on the development of high school students’ relational thinking. Computers & Education, 76, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.004
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Greenberg, M. T., & Harris, A. R. (2021). Nurturing mindfulness in children and youth: Current state of research. Child Development Perspectives, 15(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12398
Hadi, B. S., Mukminan, M., Siasah, M., & Sariyono, K. E. (2021). The effect of Google Earth-assisted remote sensing learning on students’ spatial thinking ability in solving disaster mitigation problems. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 884(1), Article 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/884/1/012013
Hickman, J. (2023). Spatial thinking and GIS: Developing and assessing student competencies. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 32(2), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2022.2138172
Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215–239). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg016
Kim, M. (2024). Strategies for cultivating powerful knowledge using geospatial technologies at the secondary education level. Geography, 109(3), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2024.2395174
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Lee, J., & Bednarz, R. (2009). Effect of GIS learning on spatial thinking. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260802276714
Meiklejohn, J., Phillips, C., Freedman, M. L., Griffin, M. L., Biegel, G., Roach, A., Frank, J., Burke, C., Pinger, L., Soloway, G., & Saltzman, A. (2012). Integrating mindfulness training into K–12 education: Fostering the resilience of teachers and students. Mindfulness, 3(4), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0094-5
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Perugini, S., & Bodzin, A. M. (2020). Using web-based GIS to assess students’ geospatial knowledge of hurricanes and spatial habits of mind. Journal of Geography, 119(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2019.1710764
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Saddington, L., & McConnell, F. (2024). Simulating alternative internationals: Geopolitics role-playing in UK schools. Geoforum, 151, Article 104011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104011
Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Lawlor, M. S. (2010). The effects of a mindfulness-based education program on pre- and early adolescents’ well-being and social and emotional competence. Mindfulness, 1(3), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-010-0011-8
Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning: Teori, riset, dan praktik ([nama penerjemah], Trans.). Nusa Media.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
UNESCO. (2023). Transforming education summit report. UNESCO.
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yulia Enshanty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
