Critical review of mine closure regulations and alignment with ecological restoration principles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jcreco.v2i1.1743Keywords:
ecological restoration, mine closure, regulationAbstract
Background: Indonesia, as one of the largest coal producers and exporters, faces negative impacts of mining such as water quality degradation, landscape changes, and social conflicts. Although the government has various regulations from MEMR and MoEF, the implementation of mine reclamation is often suboptimal, hampering ecological and biodiversity recovery. This study examines environmental regulations, especially related to mine closure issued by the two ministries. Methods: This study uses a literature study method by analyzing mining closure regulations in Indonesia, including the Decree of the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources No. 7/2014, the Decree of the Minister of Environment No. 3/2014, and the Decree of the Minister of Finance No. P.60/Menhut-II/2009, and their relation to ecological restoration. The analysis was conducted using the content analysis method to extract conclusions from related documents, focusing on the criteria for the success of reclamation and mine closure. Findings: There are differences in mine closure regulations with ecological restoration criteria, which show that the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 7/2014 has the highest suitability with a score of 54.55%. This analysis reveals that the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation emphasizes stakeholder consultation, rehabilitation planning, and monitoring, while the Minister of Forestry Regulation No. 60/2009 focuses more on vegetation formation and erosion control, and the Minister of Environment Regulation No. 3/2014 provides guidelines for biodiversity management and fauna recolonization. conclusion: This study shows that the current reclamation and post-mining regulations from the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Ministry of Forestry, and Ministry of Environment require coordination to create regulations that ensure sustainable mining in Indonesia. Novelty/Originality of This Study: The novelty of this study lies in its critical analysis of regulatory gaps, highlighting the need for synchronized policies to ensure effective ecological restoration in the mine closure phase.
References
AT Lima, et al . ( 2016). The Legacy Of Surface Mning: Remediation, Restoration, Reclamation and Rehabilitation .Environmental Science Policy : Elsevier.
Ardiyanto , W . & Isaac, Y. (2017). Assessment Policy for the Success of Post-Coal Mine Reclamation in Indonesia. Journal of Forestry Policy Analysis Vol.4, No.2 ,: 121-136.
British Petroleum. (2017). BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2017 . www.bp.com.Diakses on September 1, 2017, at 22:20 pm.
CEIC.( 2017) .Indonesiacoalproduction.https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/indonesia/coal-production accessed on 20 March 2018 Pk. 20:17 hrs
Environmental Agenct District Paser (2018).Proses penetapan tahura lati petangis. http://dlh.paserkab.go.id/detailpost/proses-penetapan-tahura-lati-petangis diakses tanggal 28 maret 2018 Pk. 20.15 WIB
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide. (2010). Guidebook for Evaluating Mining Project EIAs . Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide Journal.
G.,Mcguire.(2003). Managing mine closure risks in developing communities – a case study, Kelian Equatorial Mining, Indonesia.Sydney: Mining risk management conference.
Government of Indonesia. (2014). Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Decree No. 7 Year 2014 on the Implementation of Reclamation and Post-Mining on Mineral and Coal Mining Business Activities.
Government of Indonesia.(2016). Ministry of Environment and Forestry Decree No.P.50 / Menlhk / Setjen / Kum.1 / 6/2016 on Guidelines for Use of Forest Areas.
Government of Indonesia.(2009).The Law of the Republic of Indonesia no. 32 of 2009 on the Protection and Management of the Environment.
Government of Indonesia.(1999).The Law of the Republic of Indonesia no. 41 of 1999 on Forestry.
Government of Indonesia.(2010).Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 78 of 2010 on Reclamation and Post-mining.
Government of Indonesia.(2011).Ministry of Forestry Decree no. 4 of 2011 on Forest Reclamation Guidelines.
Government of Indonesia.(2009). Ministry of Forestry no. 60 of 2009 on Guidelines for Assessing the Success of Forest Reclamation.
Government of Indonesia.(1999).Ministry of environment No. 3 of 2014 on the Program For Pollution Control, Evaluation and Rating/PROPER.
Prasad, BD 2008. Content analysis: A method of Social Science Research. New Delhi: Rawat Publications.
MMSD. 2002. Research on Mine Closure Policy. IIED
Nichols, OG, et al . (2005). Developing Ecological Completion Criteria To Measure the Success of Forest and Woodland Establishment on Rehabilitated Mines in Australia. Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation , 2005 (1), 807-830.
Hazarika P. , et al . (2006). Natural colonization of plant species on coal mine spoils at Tikak Colliery, Assam . International Soc Trop Ecol 47 (1): 37 - 46.
Hobbs,RJ 1996. Towards a Conceptual Framework for Restoration Ecology. Restoration ecology Vol. 4 No. 2 , pp . 93-110
Weber,RP(1990). Basic Content Analysis .2ndedition,Newbury Park,CA.
Zhenqi,H., et al . ( 2012). Ecological restoration of abandoned mine land in China. Journal of Resources and Ecology Vol.3 No. 4.
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Arief Adi Pradana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.