Reconceptualizing authenticity in islamic urban heritage: A critical spatial analysis of ritual practice, collective memory, and community engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jcbau.v3i1.2025.1841Keywords:
critical spatial theory, eyüpsultan, islamic heritage, lived authenticity, sacred urbanismAbstract
Background: Eyüpsultan, one of Istanbul’s most historically and spiritually significant Islamic urban quarters, faces increasing pressure from rapid urban development and heritage commodification. These transformations challenge conventional understandings of authenticity, especially in sacred urban contexts. This study aims to introduce and develop the concept of Lived Authenticity—a framework that interprets authenticity not only as material preservation but as a dynamic, culturally embedded experience shaped by ritual, spatial memory, and community engagement. Methods: Using a qualitative methodology, the research combines visual-spatial ethnography, photographic documentation, semi-structured interviews, and historical-architectural review conducted over a twelve-month period in Eyüpsultan. Findings: The study finds that the authenticity of Eyüpsultan is continuously produced and reaffirmed through embodied religious practices, evolving spatial configurations, and collective memory. This Lived Authenticity resists static or object-based definitions, offering instead a perspective rooted in continuity of use and sacred urban rhythms. Conclusion: The research challenges dominant conservation paradigms by proposing a contextually grounded model of authenticity, contributing to theoretical discourses in Islamic urban heritage and offering insights for participatory, community-oriented preservation strategies. Novelty/Originality of this Article: This study offers a novel concept of “Lived Authenticity” that reconceptualizes urban heritage authenticity as an active, embodied cultural experience shaped by community practices and spatial memory, moving beyond traditional static preservation models.
References
Altun, S. (2023). Eyüpsultan’da Kültür Turizmi Bağlaminda Miras Rotasi Önerisi. Uluslararası Beşeri ve Sosyal Bilimler İnceleme Dergisi, 7(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.55243/ihssr.1402343
Bali, M. (2020). Kamusal Mekanın Göstergebilim Bağlamında İncelenmesi: İstanbul Eyüp Su ltan Meydanı. Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6, 225–242. https://doi.org/10.46250/kulturder.775594
Baydar, G., Murat, K., Ahenk, Y., & Kıvanç, K. (2016). Digitizing Lefebvre’s Spatial Triad. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqw061
Belediyesi, T. C. E. (n.d.). Eyüpsultan Gezi Rehberi Rota Haritaları. Eyüpsultan Gezi Rehberi Rota Haritaları. https://www.eyupsultan.bel.tr/tr/main/pages/eyupsultan-gezi-rehberi-rota-haritalari/1842
Belmessaoud -Boukhalfa, Dr. B. (2012). The ethical dimension of Islamic urban architectural heritage as susta inable design. WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment, 1, 917–928. https://doi.org/10.2495/sc120772
Bessant, K. C. (2011). Authenticity, Community, and Modernity. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-5914.2010.00443.X
Bianca, S. (2000). Urban form in the Arab world: Past and present. vdf.
Biçakçi, A. (2012). Branding the city through culture: Istanbul, European Capital of Cultu re 2010.
Bondarabady, H., & Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R. (2018). The structural variability of quarters and residential areas in the hi storical texture of the city of Yazd based on Islamic rules and jurisp rudence: A case study of Golchinan quarter. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban S Ustainability, 11(2), 202–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2017.1417888
Brumann, C. (2017). How to be authentic in the UNESCO World Heritage system: Copies, repli cas, reconstructions, and renovations in a global conservation area.
Charmaz, K. (2012). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (Repr). Sage.
Darling, J. (2009). Thinking Beyond Place: The Responsibilities of a Relational Spatial Po litics. Geography Compass, 3(5), 1938–1954. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00262.x
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543
Falser, M. (2010). From Venice 1964 to Nara 1994—Changing concepts of authenticity?
García, L. J. (1993). Cultura, espacio y organización urbana en la ciudad islámica.
Gulliver, M. (2017). Seeking Lefebvre’s vécu in a “deaf space” classroom. In Deterritorializing/reterritorializing: critical geography of educational reform (pp. 99-107). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-977-5_7
Hakim, B. S. (1994). The “Urf” and Its Role in Diversifying the Architecture of Traditional Islamic Cities. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 11(2), 108–127. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43029115
Insa, P., & Josefa, L. (2021). Das kollektive Ritual als Performance? Die Herstellung von religiöser „Authentizität“ in der differenzierten Gesellschaft. Zeitschrift Für Religion Gesellschaft Und Politik. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-021-00086-w
Gulson, K. N. (2015). Relational space and education policy analysis. In Education Policy and Contemporary Theory (pp. 219-229). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315818429-19
Kamal, M. A., Warsi, T. R., & Nasir, O. (2023). Islamic Principles as a Design Framework for Urban System: Environment Al Concern And Sustainable Development. Journal of Islamic Architecture, 7(4), 699–712. https://doi.org/10.18860/jia.v7i4.21187
Karaman, A., & Levent. (2000). Globalisation And Development Strategies For Istanbul.
Kaya, H. S., & Bölen, F. (2017). Urban DNA: Morphogenetic analysis of urban pattern. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 5(1), 10-41. https://doi.org/10.15320/iconarp.2017.15
Kubat, S., & Ayse, S. (2001). Istanbul: A Configurational Model for a Metropolis.
Latip, N. S. A., Harun, N. Z., Abdullah, A., & Ibrahim, M. (2020). The derivation of urban design principles in Malay-islamic town of Kuala Terengganu. Planning Malaysia, 18. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i12.758
Le, V. A., & Nguyen, T. K. N. (2024). Discussion of So-Called “Architectural Heritage DNA” via a Case Study of the Conservation of the Nara Palace Site, Japan. Buildings, 14(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14010132
Leary-Owhin, M. (2016). A Fresh Look at Lefebvre ’ s Spatial Triad and Differential Space: A Central Place in Planning Theory ?
Márton, B. (2015). A térbeliség trialektikája. Tér és társadalom, 29(2), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.29.2.2658
Massey, D. B. (2012). For space (1. publ., repr). Sage.
Meegan, R. (2017). Doreen Massey (1944–2016): A geographer who really mattered. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1329434
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Third edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Mortada, H. (2002). Urban sustainability in the tradition of Islam. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 54.https://doi.org/10.2495/URS020681
Nuray, Ö. (1995). Historic urban fabric: Source of inspiration for contemporary city fo rm. Institute of Advanced Architectural Studies.
Okawa, N. (2002). Historic conservation now needs re-examination of its basic concepts. ICOMOS 13th General Assembly: Strategies for the World’s Cultural Heritage - Preservation in a Globalised World - Principles, Practices, Perspectives
Pessi A. (2013). Privatized religiosity revisited: Building an authenticity model of in dividual–church relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768612472592
Pink, S. (2013). Doing visual ethnography (3rd edition). SAGE.
Rodgers, J. (2004). Doreen Massey. Information, Communication & Society, 7(2), 273-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118042000232693
Scott, D. A. (2015). Conservation and authenticity: Interactions and enquiries. Studies in Conservation, 60(5), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047058414y.0000000159
Senova, B. (2011). Exploring the City: Perceiving Istanbul through its Cultural Productio ns. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(2), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.01032.x
Seran, E. S. (2010). Speaking and sensing the self in authentic movement: The search for au thenticity in a 21st century white urban middle-class community.
Sergot, B., & Saives, A. L. (2016). Unplugged-Relating place to organization: A situated tribute to Doreen Massey. M@ n@ gement, 19(4), 335-352. https://doi.org/10.3917/MANA.194.0335
Shojaee, F., & Paeezeh, M. (2015). Islamic city and urbanism, an obvious example of sustainable architect ure and city. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 36(6), 231-237. https://doi.org/10.17776/CSJ.56002
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263
Stovel, H. (2008). Origins and influence of the Nara document on authenticity.
Taylor, L. (2013). The case as space: Implications of relational thinking for methodology and method. Qualitative inquiry, 19(10), 807-817. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413503799
Watkins, C. (2005). Representations of space, spatial practices and spaces of representation: An application of Lefebvre’s spatial triad. Culture and organization, 11(3), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759550500203318
Wells, J. (2007). The Plurality of Truth in Culture, Context, and Heritage: A (Mostly) P ost-Structuralist Analysis of Urban Conservation Charters. City & Time, 3(2), 1. https://docs.rwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1018&context=saahp_fp
Winter, T. (2012). Beyond Eurocentrism? Heritage conservation and the politics of differe nce. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.736403
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maya Yulistyoningsih, Mehmet A.K., Awa Salma Ayako
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
