Reconstructing Theology in practice: Aguron-guron as the renewal of Sulinggih Brahmana Wangsa leadership

Authors

  • Ida Bagus Subrahmaniam Saitya Department of Hindu Theology, Faculty of Brahma Widya, Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa, Denpasar, Bali 80239, Indonesia
  • I Made Dwitayasa Department of Brahma Widya, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa, Denpasar, Bali 80239, Indonesia
  • Acyutananda Wayan Gaduh Department of Kepanditaan, Faculty of Brahma Widya, Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa, Denpasar, Bali 80239, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/ijroms.v4i1.2026.4020

Keywords:

aguron-guron, Hindu priesthood, Sulinggih Brahmana Wangsa, theological reconstruction

Abstract

Background: The aguron-guron system forms Sulinggih Brahmana Wangsa priests through a master–disciple relationship between a Guru Nabe and a candidate priest, culminating in initiation (diksa). Existing studies mostly treat it as pedagogical structure, genealogical practice, or aesthetic experience, and rarely ask whether the faith it transmits still functions as a living ethical foundation rather than inherited dogma. This study reads aguron-guron through Hasan Hanafi's theological reconstruction, understood as a critical stance toward heritage, modernity, and lived social reality. Methods: This qualitative field study with a theological approach was conducted in Denpasar between May and November 2025. Data came from in-depth interviews with five purposively selected key informants (four senior Sulinggih and one senior lay official of Parisada Hindu Dharma Indonesia (PHDI) Denpasar), observation at four griya, and documentary study of the Silakramaning Aguron-guron and Siwa Sasana. Analysis combined Hanafi's framework as an initial lens with descriptive coding. Findings: Among these informants, reconstruction appears along three interlocking dimensions. Inherited teaching is re-actualized by each Guru Nabe's judgment,  rather than mechanically repeated. Modern pressures are met selectively: digital media are made to serve dharma and formal religious education is recommended before diksa, while declining numbers of candidates remain unresolved. On institutional legitimacy, informants connected to PHDI favor its involvement in diksa pariksa, whereas one informant regards a nationwide association of Brahmana Wangsa descendants as equally legitimate. Conclusion: Within the limits of five informants from one lineage in one city, aguron-guron appears as an ongoing theological effort, more complete on some dimensions than others, rather than a static heritage under threat. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study offers an exploratory comparative-theological reading of aguron-guron using a framework drawn from Islamic thought, together with a field-based account of differing views on the griya–PHDI relationship over priestly legitimacy.

References

Agastia, I. B. G. (1994). Dwijendra Tattwa. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Ambarnuari, M., Gaduh, A. W., & Sandhi, K. D. D. W. (2024). Sistem Aguron-guron di Griya Agung Bangkasa Kecamatan Abiansemal Kabupaten Badung. Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama, 7(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.37329/kamaya.v7i1.3067

Arka, I. M. (2025). Dinamika sistem Aguron-guron Calon Sulinggih di Kota Denpasar. Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar.

Arka, I. M., Sudiana, I. G. N., & Putrawan, I. N. A. (2025). Dynamics of The Sulinggih candidate Aguron-Guron System in Denpasar City. MSJ : Majority Science Journal, 3(1), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v3i1.299

Badruzaman, A. (2005). Kiri Islam Hassan Hanafi menggugat kemapanan agama dan politik. Tiara Wacana.

Clooney, F. X. (2010). Comparative theology: Deep learning across religious borders. Wiley-Blackwell.

Donder, I. K. (2009). Teologi: Memasuki gerbang ilmu pengetahuan ilmiah tentang Tuhan Paradigma Sanatana Dharma. Paramita.

Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press.

Hamzah. (2013). Teologi sosial telaah pemikiran Hassan Hanafi. Graha Ilmu.

Hanafi, H. (2000). Islam in the Modern world: Tradition, revolution and culture. Daru Quba.

Kaelan. (2012). Metode penelitian kualitatif interdisipliner bidang sosial, budaya, filsafat, seni, agama, dan humaniora. Paradigma.

Paramartha, W., & Yasa, I. W. S. (2017). Mengungkap model pendidikan Hindu Bali Tradisional Aguron-guron. MUDRA Jurnal Seni Budaya, 32(1), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v32i1.92

Pitana, I. G. (2010). Tri Hita Karana–The local wisdom of the Balinese in managing development. Trends and Issues in Global Tourism (pp. 139–150). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10829-7_18

Punyatmadja, I. B. O. (2011). Silakrama. Parisada Hindu Dharma Indonesia Provinsi Bali.

Putra, A. P. D. (2026). Sakralitas digital Hindu Bali translokasi ruang suci ke media sosial. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 10(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v10i1.4481

Putra, I. B. R. (Ed.). (2013). Swastikarana, pedoman ajaran Hindu dharma. Parisada Hindu Dharma Indonesia.

Saitya, I. B. S., Dwitayasa, I. M., Gaduh, A. W., & Saskara, I. B. (2026). Sistem Aguron-guron Sulinggih Brahmana Wangsa pewarisan spiritual, kepemimpinan keagamaan, dan dinamika sosial Hindu Bali. PT. Dharma Pustaka Utama.

Saitya, I. B. S., Wirawan, N. G., & Anggriawan, G. A. (2020). Ajaran dalam teks silakramaning Aguron-guron. Sphatika: Jurnal Teologi, 11(2), 168–179. https://ojs.uhnsugriwa.ac.id/index.php/Sphatika/article/view/1964

Suadnyana, I. B. P. E. (2022). Sistem Aguron-Guron di Banjar Umadiwang Desa Batannyuh, Kecamatan Marga, Kabupaten Tabanan. Bawi Ayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Dan Budaya Hindu, 13(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.33363/ba.v13i1.648

Subawa, I. M. P. (2021). Pemaknaan Diksa dalam tahapan menjadi pandita pada ajaran agama Hindu. Sphatika: Jurnal Teologi, 12(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.25078/sp.v12i2.3017

Sudharta, T. R., & Atmaja, I. B. O. P. (2001). Upadesa tentang ajaran-ajaran Agama Hindu. Paramita.

Suhardana, K. M. (2008). Dasar-dasar kesulinggihan suatu pengantar Bagi Sisya Calon Sulinggih. Paramita.

Sukarma, I. W. (2016). Tri Hita Karana: Theoretical basic of moral Hindu. Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(3), 102–116.

Tim Penyusun. (2022). Pedoman pelaksanaan Diksa. Perkumpulan Dharmopadesa Pusat Nusantara.

Titib, I. M. (2003). Teologi dan simbol-simbol dalam Agama Hindu. Pāramita.

Utama, I. M. S., Yasa, I. W. S., & Utama, I. W. B. (2019). Tantrisme di dalam Aguron Guron Kawikon Budha Paksa di Gria Budakeling. Dharmasmrti, 10(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.32795/ds.v10i1.331

Viprajana, I. B. M. (2025). Eksistensi Gria pasca era reformasi di Bali. Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa.

Wiana, I. K. (2007). Resi Yajña dan sistem kepaṇḍitaan Hindu. Diksa, Pintu Menapaki Jalan Rohani (pp. 40–73). Paramita.

Wiradnyana, I. B. G. (2025). Mapulang Lingga implementasi Yoga Tantra pada Institusi Diksa Pandita Siwa. PT. Dharma Pustaka Utama.

Yuliani, N. M. (2026). Relasi agama dan media digital transformasi otoritas keagamaan di era komunikasi virtual. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 10(1), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v10i1.4942

Zulaiha, S. (2017). Pendekatan metodologis dan teologis bagi pengembangan dan peningkatan kualitas guru MI. AR-RIAYAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.29240/jpd.v1i1.220

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

How to Cite

Saitya, I. B. S., Dwitayasa, I. M., & Gaduh, A. W. (2026). Reconstructing Theology in practice: Aguron-guron as the renewal of Sulinggih Brahmana Wangsa leadership. Dharmakirti : International Journal of Religion, Mind and Science, 4(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.61511/ijroms.v4i1.2026.4020

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check