Transition risk analysis of a 20 mw electrical power capacity addition at PT X, a palm oil processing plant

Authors

  • Muflihatun Nahriyah School of Environmental Science, Universitas Indonesia, Central Jakarta, Special Capital Region of Jakarta 10430, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/enjust.v2i2.2025.4154

Keywords:

electrical power, palm oil, risk analysis

Abstract

Background: In line with the government's Net Zero Emission (NZE) policy, Indonesia's low-carbon policy creates transition risks for companies. The addition of 20 MW of electrical power at PT X, a palm oil processing plant in South Kalimantan, requires a comprehensive transition risk analysis. This analysis aims to identify and manage the potential risks that may arise during this energy transition process. The objectives of this study are to assess the risks associated with the power addition, identify mitigation measures to reduce adverse impacts, and provide recommendations to ensure a smooth and sustainable transition while safeguarding the company against financial loss. Methods: The risk analysis was conducted to support company management in making decisions regarding the electrical power addition at PT X in 2024. Findings: The findings indicate that Indonesia’s low-carbon policy and carbon-pricing implementation pose a very high transition risk to PT X, with Scenario 4 identified as the most financially favorable option. Implementing mitigation measures, including biomass fuel substitution, carbon-capture technology, energy efficiency, carbon credits, and renewable energy certificates, could reduce the risk level from very high (25) to low (9), thereby minimizing potential operational and financial losses. Conclusion: The 20 MW power addition at PT X using electricity supplied by PLN carries lower risk compared with a power plant expansion. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study highlights the importance of transition risk analysis in supporting PT X's efforts to achieve a smooth and sustainable energy transition while safeguarding the company's financial interests and considering the surrounding environment.

References

Anufriev, V. P., & Kuligin, A. P. (2014). A strategy for the innovative low-carbon growth of the Sverdlovsk region, Russia. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 190, 161-168. https://doi.org/10.2495/EQ140171

Arms, K. (1990). Environmental science. Saunders College Publishing.

Bachner, G., Wolkinger, B., Mayer, J., Tuerk, A., & Steininger, K. W. (2020). Risk assessment of the low-carbon transition of Austria’s steel and electricity sectors. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35, 309-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.005

Baldzhy, M. (2023). Risk management strategies in the global business environment: Analysis of complex dependencies and effectiveness of measures. Economic Affairs, 68(4). https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.4.2023.20

Campbell, R. J. (2015). Increasing the efficiency of existing coal-fired power plants. In Coal-fired power plants: Efficiency improvement options.

Chiras, D. D. (2010). Environmental science (8th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

Easterbrook, D. J. (2016). Greenhouse gases. In D. J. Easterbrook (Ed.), Evidence-based climate science (2nd ed., pp. 163-173). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804588-6.00009-4

Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishers.

Ghezelhesar, A. J., & Bozorgi-Amiri, A. (2022). A novel approach to selection of resilient measures portfolio under disruption and uncertainty: A case study of e-payment service providers. Operational Research, 22(5), 5477-5527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-022-00709-x

Harvey, J. A., Tougeron, K., Gols, R., Heinen, R., Abarca, M., Abram, P. K., Basset, Y., Berg, M., Boggs, C., Brodeur, J., Cardoso, P., de Boer, J. G., De Snoo, G. R., Deacon, C., Dell, J. E., Desneux, N., Dillon, M. E., Duffy, G. A., Dyer, L. A., ... Chown, S. L. (2023). Scientists’ warning on climate change and insects. Ecological Monographs, 93(1), Article e1553. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1553

IPCC. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 35-115). IPCC.

Liu, D., Guo, X., & Xiao, B. (2019). What causes growth of global greenhouse gas emissions? Evidence from 40 countries. Science of The Total Environment, 661, 750-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.197

Livieri, G., Radi, D., & Smaniotto, E. (2024). Pricing transition risk with a jump-diffusion credit risk model: Evidence from the CDS market. Review of Corporate Finance, 4(1-2), 177-201. https://doi.org/10.1561/114.00000064

Loew, A., Jaramillo, P., Zhai, H., Ali, R., Nijssen, B., Cheng, Y., & Klima, K. (2020). Fossil fuel-fired power plant operations under a changing climate. Climatic Change, 163(1), 619-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02834-y

Miller, G. T., & Spoolman, S. E. (2018). Living in the environment (19th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2016, April 23). Indonesia menandatangani Perjanjian Paris tentang perubahan iklim [Press release]. https://ppid.menlhk.go.id/siaran_pers/browse/298

Ministry of Industry of the Republic of Indonesia. (2023, September 17). Direktori perusahaan industri di SIINas. https://kemenperin.go.id/direktoriperusahaan?what=&prov=0&hal=2644

Nag, S., Chakrabarty, S. P., & Basu, S. (2023). Single event transition risk: A measure for long term carbon exposure. MethodsX, 10, Article 102001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102001

Namvar, H., & Bamdad, S. (2021). Performance evaluation of process industries resilience: Risk-based with a network approach. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 71, Article 104474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104474

Pandey, D., Agrawal, M., & Pandey, J. S. (2011). Carbon footprint: Current methods of estimation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 178(1-4), 135-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y

Penmetsa, V., & Holbert, K. E. (2021). Climate change effects on thermal power generation and projected losses in generation and income in the U.S. for the period 2020-2050. In 2020 52nd North American Power Symposium (NAPS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS50074.2021.9449688

Ralston Fonseca, F., Craig, M., Jaramillo, P., Bergés, M., Severnini, E., Loew, A., Zhai, H., Cheng, Y., Nijssen, B., Voisin, N., & Yearsley, J. (2021). Effects of climate change on capacity expansion decisions of an electricity generation fleet in the Southeast U.S. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(4), 2522-2531. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06547

Semieniuk, G., Campiglio, E., Mercure, J., Volz, U., & Edwards, N. R. (2021). Low-carbon transition risks for finance. WIREs Climate Change, 12(1), Article e678. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.678

Septiani, R., Huboyo, H. S., & Sumiyati, S. (2021). Evaluation of co-firing application in power plant’s coal combustion. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 802(1), Article 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/802/1/012057

Triani, M., & Dewi, K. (2022). Carbon emission reduction and indicative carbon revenue in the coal-fired power plants in Indonesia. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2554. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0103750

Tuckett, R. (2019). Greenhouse gases. In P. Worsfold, C. Poole, A. Townshend, & M. Miró (Eds.), Encyclopedia of analytical science (3rd ed., pp. 362-372). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.14031-4

United Nations. (2021, October 31). Glasgow was chosen by the UK to host COP26 due to its experience, commitment to sustainability and world-class facilities. UN Climate Change Conference UK 2021. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20230104144943/https://ukcop26.org/the-conference/

Vermeulen, R., Schets, E., Lohuis, M., Kölbl, B., Jansen, D.-J., & Heeringa, W. (2021). The heat is on: A framework for measuring financial stress under disruptive energy transition scenarios. Ecological Economics, 190, Article 107205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107205

Worldagriculturalproduction.com. (2022, December). World palm oil production 2022/2023.

Published

2026-11-05

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check