Governance, regulation, and public trust in pawnshop services: A systematic review

Authors

  • Dhian Kusumawardhani Research Center of Public Policy, National Research and Innovation Agency, South Jakarta, 12710, Indonesia
  • Risa Nurhaliza Department of Communication Science, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java 50275, Indonesia
  • Fadhilatul Fachrunnisa Department of Public Policy and Management, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Special Region of Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjol.v4i1.2026.3473

Keywords:

consumer protection, governance, pawnbroking, regulation, trust

Abstract

Background: Pawnbroking occupies a distinctive regulatory position because borrowers retain ownership of pledged goods while possession passes to the pawnbroker. Yet the literature describes formal rules, access to credit and service experience more often than it examines how supervision, enforcement and redress work in practice. This review examines how scholarship on pawnshop governance and regulation has evolved and how trust has been conceptualised and studied. Methods: A socio-legal systematic review, reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020, identified 87 peer-reviewed studies in Scopus after full-text assessment. The evidence was examined through narrative synthesis and inductive thematic analysis. Criterion-level methodological appraisal was used to qualify individual findings. Findings: Six overlapping themes were identified: regulatory design and enforcement; consumer protection and vulnerability; digital transformation and platform governance; financial inclusion and distributive justice; service quality and customer satisfaction; and Islamic pawnbroking. The studies addressed statutory design more clearly than the operation of supervision, enforcement and redress. Trust-related material appeared in 13 studies, although some relied on adjacent constructs such as satisfaction, reputation, perceived risk or intention to use. Direct examination of trust usually concerned the pawnbroker, the organisation or the service platform. No included study directly measured trust in regulators, complaint mechanisms or supervisory institutions. Conclusion: Formal rules, access to credit and favourable service assessments cannot by themselves show how pawnshop governance works for borrowers. Evaluation must also consider whether protection functions during the transaction and whether borrowers can obtain redress when problems arise. Novelty/Originality of this article: The review separates trust in service providers from trust in regulatory institutions. It also shows that implementation, redress and the division of responsibility in digital pawn transactions remain insufficiently examined.

References

Abdul Razak, A., & Asutay, M. (2022). Financial inclusion and economic well-being: Evidence from Islamic pawnbroking (Ar-Rahn) in Malaysia. Research in International Business and Finance, 59, 101557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101557

Andryushchenko, G. I., Andryushchenko, A. M., Maloletko, A. N., Savina, M. V., & Solodukha, P. V. (2017). Risks of developing the pawnshops market in the Russian Federation. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(8), 117–125.

Bahri S, A., & Hardiansyah, Y. (2022). The Sharia pawnshops and its role for community resilience in the days of Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from Indonesia and Malaysia. Tazkia Islamic Finance and Business Review, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.30993/tifbr.v16i1.286

Beetham, D. (2013). The legitimation of power (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Bhutta, N., Goldin, J., & Homonoff, T. (2016). Consumer borrowing after payday loan bans. Journal of Law and Economics, 59(1), 225–259. https://doi.org/10.1086/686033

Boel, P., & Zimmerman, P. (2022). Unbanked in America: A review of the literature (Economic Commentary No. 2022-07). Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cane, P., & Kritzer, H. M. (Eds.). (2010). The Oxford handbook of empirical legal research. Oxford University Press.

Carter, S. P., & Skiba, P. M. (2012). Pawnshops, behavioral economics, and self-regulation. Review of Banking & Financial Law, 32(1), 193–220.

Cartwright, P. (2004). Banks, consumers and regulation. Hart Publishing.

Caskey, J. P. (1991). Pawnbroking in America: The economics of a forgotten credit market. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 23(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/1992765

Consumer Credit Act 1974, c. 39 (UK). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39

Degenshein, A. (2017). Strategies of valuation: Repertoires of worth at the financial margins. Theory and Society, 46(5), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9297-z

Ekpo, A. E., Drenten, J., Albinsson, P. A., Anong, S., Appau, S., Chatterjee, L., Dadzie, C. A., Echelbarger, M., Muldrow, A., Ross, S. M., Santana, S., & Weinberger, M. F. (2022). The platformed money ecosystem: Digital financial platforms, datafication, and reimagining financial well-being. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 56(3), 1062–1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12458

Financial Conduct Authority. (2023). Principles for Businesses (PRIN), including Principle 12 and PRIN 2A (Consumer Duty, in force 31 July 2023). FCA Handbook. Retrieved 14 June 2026, from https://handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/PRIN/

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, c. 8 (UK). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/8

Goode, R., & Gullifer, L. (2017). Goode and Gullifer on legal problems of credit and security (6th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.

Goode, R., & Gullifer, L. (2022). Goode and Gullifer on legal problems of credit and security (7th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.

Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2022). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 6.3). Cochrane. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook

Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O'Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., & Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018: User guide (Registration of Copyright No. 1148552). Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Industry Canada.

Hung, T.-C., & Lin, C.-Y. (2022). Key sustainable factors of the pawnbroking industry: An empirical study in Taiwan. Sustainability, 14(19), 12669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912669

Ilias, I. I., Hassan, R., Kassim, S., & Abu Bakar, E. (2021). Consumer credit grievance and redress mechanisms: The Malaysia perspective. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 12(2), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2021.12.2.4

Inoue, T. (2021). The role of pawnshops in risk coping in early twentieth-century Japan. Financial History Review, 28(3), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0968565021000111

Iskandar, I., & Addiarrahman, A. (2017). Sejarah sosial perkembangan hukum gadai dan rahn (gadai syariah) di Indonesia. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 17(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v17i02.62

Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 (Act 759) (Malaysia).

Kharisma, D. B. (2021). Urgency of financial technology (fintech) laws in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(3), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-08-2020-0233

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata [Indonesian Civil Code], arts. 1150–1160.

Legislation and Regulatory Materials

Lima, W. H., & Ballo, F. W. (2026). Digitalization of pawnshop services and financial inclusion in Indonesia's underdeveloped, outermost, and remote regions: A systematic literature review. Community Service for Sustainable Community Journal, 3(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.61511/csjsc.v3i1.2026.3339

Maulani, D. (2020). E-government: Efektivitas layanan aplikasi Pegadaian Syariah Digital Service (PSDS) pada Cabang Pegadaian Syariah Bogor Baru. Jurnal Manajemen Strategi dan Aplikasi Bisnis, 3(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.36407/jmsab.v3i2.140

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792

Methley, A. M., Campbell, S., Chew-Graham, C., McNally, R., & Cheraghi-Sohi, S. (2014). PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: A comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Services Research, 14, Article 579. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0

Miller, G., Hanke, S. A., & Di, H. (2018). Pawnshops regulatory environment: A readability analysis. Journal of Accounting, Business and Management, 25(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.31966/jabminternational.v1i25.329

Mohd Zain, N. R., & Hasan, A. (2021). Ar-Rahnu: Isu dan penyelesaian semasa [Ar-Rahnu: Current issues and solutions]. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 9(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol9no1.239

Nicolini, G., & Cude, B. J. (2019). The influence of financial well-being on pawnshop use. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 53(4), 1674–1692. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12244

Nik Azman, N. H., Kassim, S., & Adeyemi, A. A. (2018). Analysing Ar-Rahnu in the context of informal credit market theory: Evidence from women micro-entrepreneurs in Malaysia. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 10(2), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-09-2017-0031

O'Brien, L., Ramsay, I., & Ali, P. (2024). Lending on the edge: Pawnbroking in Australia. University of Queensland Law Journal, 43(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v43i1.8113

Oeltjen, J. C. (1996). Florida pawnbroking: An industry in transition. Florida State University Law Review, 23(4), 995–1041. https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol23/iss4/6

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Pawnbrokers Act 1972 (Act 81) (Malaysia).

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 39 Tahun 2024 tentang Pergadaian.

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 39 Tahun 2024 tentang Pergadaian.

Presidential Decree No. 114, Pawnshop Regulation Act (1973) (Philippines). https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1973/01/29/presidential-decree-no-114-s-1973/

Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme (Version 1). Lancaster University.

Putri, P. S., & Supriadi, Y. (2022). Penerapan sistem aplikasi Pegadaian Digital Service dalam memudahkan nasabah bertransaksi pada PT Pegadaian (Persero) UPC Pagelaran. Jurnal Informatika Kesatuan, 2(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.37641/jikes.v2i1.1378

Ramsay, I., & Williams, T. (2020). Peering forward, 10 years after: International policy and consumer credit regulation. Journal of Consumer Policy, 43(1), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-019-09436-x

Serpell, A. J. (2015). Protecting the desperate: The regulation of payday lending. Federal Law Review, 43(1), 147–176.

Shackman, J. D., & Tenney, G. (2006). The effects of government regulations on the supply of pawn loans: Evidence from 51 jurisdictions in the U.S. Journal of Financial Services Research, 30(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-006-8740-5

Shah, A. A., & Yaacob, S. E. (2018). Cabaran dan alternatif penyelesaian bagi penyedia perkhidmatan Ar-Rahnu di Malaysia [Challenges and alternative solutions for Ar-Rahnu service providers in Malaysia]. UMRAN: International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies, 5(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.11113/umran2018.5n1.185

Swain, W., & Fairweather, K. (2012). The legal regulation of pawnbroking in England: A brief history. In J. Devenney & M. Kenny (Eds.), Consumer credit, debt and investment in Europe (pp. 142–159). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139003469.009

Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1990)

Wijaya, N. H. (2022). The challenges of Sharia pawnshops in Indonesia in the era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0. El-Mashlahah, 12(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.23971/elma.v12i1.3910

Wisnu, W., Nawiyanto, N., Wasino, W., & Yani, M. T. (2024). A comprehensive analysis of lending patterns at pawnshops in Java (Indonesia), 1926–1932. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2335758. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2335758

Downloads

Published

2026-07-29

How to Cite

Kusumawardhani, D., Nurhaliza, R., & Fachrunnisa, F. (2026). Governance, regulation, and public trust in pawnshop services: A systematic review. Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal Of Law, 4(1), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjol.v4i1.2026.3473

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check